Ian McEwans works have always shown an interest in the question of how fiction operates. This interest does not usually manifest on the formal level. A few of the early stories aside, his fictions are not formally experimental. McEwan tends to optMoreIan McEwans works have always shown an interest in the question of how fiction operates. This interest does not usually manifest on the formal level. A few of the early stories aside, his fictions are not formally experimental.
McEwan tends to opt for those reliable patternings of space, time and narrative progression that enable readers to trust the authorial environment sufficiently to identify with characters and become invested, to some extent, in what happens to them. Despite McEwans commitment, by and large, to naturalistic means of telling a story, his later novels also demonstrate a concern with opacity, as characters often pursue courses of action for reasons that are unclear to them.
Equally often, these actions bear some relation to the intrinsic opacity or enigma of ones sexual desires, ones relation to ones mortality, or ones relation to the actions of those human beings who have gone before one, as this book will show. It is this focus on enigma in McEwans work, whether sexual, mortal, or historical, that lends it to a psychoanalytic reading such as the kind pursued in this book, because for psychoanalysis there is no such thing as full access to ones self or to ones feelings or motivations.
Given that ones relation to history is also opaque in the sense that one grasps fully-or imagines one grasps fully-only those historical events which predate or otherwise excludes one, this study seeks historical reasons for why McEwan sometimes blocks readerly identification with characters in the early fiction. For these characters are also products of their environments, environments which the characters relative opacity and unlikeability seems to offset and exaggerate or present in a manner showcased for ones judgment. And in this way the characters environment is denaturalized, to say the least.
This book reveals how all of these works explore, to some extent, the human tendency to act and feel, in particular situations, in profound contradistinction to how one might prefer to think one would. This failure to coincide with ones image of how one would have expected, or preferred, to behave-The Innocents Leonard Marnham is not the cool, experienced lover of his imaginings, any more than Solars Michael Beard is going to revamp his lifestyle or career-produces instances of affective or imaginative excess, troubling images or feelings that can often only be allayed or dealt with by a further failure to coincide with ones desires.
In this book, author Eluned Summers-Bremner shows that McEwans interests in opacity not only become clear in significance and import but that his interests in human failure to coincide with ones views about the past and hopes for the future also appear as what they are: an ongoing concern with how one relates to the complex operation of human history.